Work & Relationships

The role we performed. The authority others retain.

We describe work according to the contribution, evidence and permission involved. Technical or service provision does not become institutional ownership.

Relationship taxonomy

Provider, partner and owner are different facts.

Technology provider

Supplies a named technical system or service within a verified scope.

Operations provider

Performs or coordinates named operational work under defined authority.

Media provider

Supplies media, communication or production services with permission.

Platform provider

Provides an evidenced hosted or runtime platform; production maturity must be stated.

Development partner

Makes a documented material contribution under approved credit and IP terms.

Legal seller or app-store provider

Appears in a platform/legal role that does not by itself prove brand ownership.

Owner or parent

Requires a controlling legal ownership or governance record. Never inferred from service provision.

Portfolio brand

Requires an approved taxonomy and an explanation of the actual ownership or governance relationship.

Display standard

No named relationship without four controls.

  1. 01Classification

    Use the exact relationship category.

  2. 02Evidence

    Retain the record supporting the present-tense claim.

  3. 03Wording

    Use a phrase that conveys only that role.

  4. 04Authorization

    Obtain public-display approval from the relevant authorities.

Current staging state

No named work is displayed.

The controlled records support independent-authority boundaries, but this build does not contain the bilateral public-display authorization needed for named organizations, logos or case studies. The absence is intentional.